Hi Nikolai,
Your text accurately recognizes confirmation bias as a common issue that can lead to conflict in open discussions on media literacy and factual information. The explanation of confirmation bias and its possible influence on people’s capacity to engage in civil conversation is simple and straightforward.
You also mentioned that the link between confirmation bias and personal learning networks (PLNs) is also widely recognized. The paragraph emphasizes the significance of having a PLN that values media literacy to defend oneself from confirmation bias.
Overall, your post clearly emphasizes the significance of detecting and resolving confirmation bias in media literacy talks, as well as how having a PLN that values media literacy may be good in limiting prejudices. Once again, great post!
Hi Hannah,
Your passage explains clearly the benefits of media literacy in a personal learning network, as well as why open conversations about media literacy can lead to conflict. I couldn’t agree more with the statement that when media tries to endanger one’s identity, it may lead to conflict. It also defines media literacy appropriately and emphasizes its significance in informed decision-making, critical thinking, responsible content production, and cooperation. The explanation for why media literacy might be ignored is helpful, outlining various impediments such as a lack of understanding, money, or technology. Your text is well-supported and succinct overall. Once again, great work!
